Arduino for STM32

I think if carefully considered, it is a software (simplified commands, functions similar to BASIC ) and hardware is not abstracted but simplified into basic functions. Even the pinout nomenclature has taken on simple naming conventions such as D0, D1, D2 ... and A0, A1, A2, A3, etc.

Yes, this ...

Thank you all for the advice, I got the impression that there aren’t really any showstoppers. This week I’ll try a nucleo board with arduino and test some peripheries. When I’m comfortable with the software experience and tool chain I will order my board
Best regards

I agree with the concept of rapid prototyping. In this case however I hope to limit the „rounds“ to two or three: one test board to develop software and one final pcb with its >300 components. The cost is really low for the pcbs but the stecil and for now the microprocessors are quite costly

mrburnette wrote: Tue Nov 30, 2021 8:10 pm
Arduino is really not well understood;

Maybe. For me arduino is just a hardware abstraction layer + IDE which is much more pleasant to use (for me) than STs‘ own HAL + IDE

Thank you for the advice, I'll have a deeper look at it in the weekend.
It seems that my hope that arduino on stm32 will work out of the box for the MCU were a bit ambitious. It may be necessary that I have to prgramm the board without arduino.
I chose the chip because it was one of the few ...

Hi there,

I'm currently designing a small test board to develop software for an upcoming larger PCB design I want to make.
In my work I usually use CubeMX to select all the Periphery I want and the software engineers implement these modes in firmware. For this non-work project I have to do every ...