I bought 50 STM32L07 ICs for a small production run.
about half of the boards i've been making have been failing in one way or another.
I've been trying to eliminate potential sources, because it's getting a little silly seeing so many beautiful devices lining my rubbish bin.
I've eliminated cheap ...
Search found 16 matches
- Thu May 27, 2021 8:44 pm
- Forum: Custom design boards
- Topic: Advice for baking STM32 ICs
- Replies: 2
- Views: 13971
- Wed Jun 17, 2020 12:35 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: U8G2.begin() takes 2.1s to start - Is this the same for everyone else?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4900
Re: U8G2.begin() takes 2.1s to start - Is this the same for everyone else?
Wow. What a pull. Outstanding advice.
back down to 1.3s with the i2c speed defined in.
Perfect. Thank you.
It makes sense to that the rest is in the library loading (as you said Ray), but the load time improved as it is is much less obtrusive.
Many thanks fpiSTM. As usual.
back down to 1.3s with the i2c speed defined in.
Perfect. Thank you.
It makes sense to that the rest is in the library loading (as you said Ray), but the load time improved as it is is much less obtrusive.
Many thanks fpiSTM. As usual.
- Thu Jun 11, 2020 6:03 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: U8G2.begin() takes 2.1s to start - Is this the same for everyone else?
- Replies: 3
- Views: 4900
U8G2.begin() takes 2.1s to start - Is this the same for everyone else?
HI All.
I'm using the U8G2 library to run a little SH1106 screen on my STM32L07 variant board.
When I turn on the board, There's a boot screen to let some internals load and some values settle.
However, before the boot logo appears on the screen, there's a very uncomfortable 2.1s delay.
Peppering ...
I'm using the U8G2 library to run a little SH1106 screen on my STM32L07 variant board.
When I turn on the board, There's a boot screen to let some internals load and some values settle.
However, before the boot logo appears on the screen, there's a very uncomfortable 2.1s delay.
Peppering ...
- Fri May 08, 2020 5:01 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: STM32L07 Simple EEPROM read and write without the example code.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15143
Re: STM32L07 Simple EEPROM read and write without the example code.
Thanks for taking a look at it man.
After trying out various bits of scavenged code without success, I've got the example code snippets off the ST website.
Surprisingly hard to find from google. The reference manual has a phrase to search for on the ST website which opens the secret door behind the ...
After trying out various bits of scavenged code without success, I've got the example code snippets off the ST website.
Surprisingly hard to find from google. The reference manual has a phrase to search for on the ST website which opens the secret door behind the ...
- Thu May 07, 2020 8:45 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: STM32L07 Simple EEPROM read and write without the example code.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15143
Re: STM32L07 Simple EEPROM read and write without the example code.
I've only just realised that STM32 Cube programmer allows you to view the data from whatever memory location you like. Very useful. EEPROM address (0x08080000) is all 0s, so my suspicion that the write was going through was also wrong.
No read or write protection bits seem to be set, so, back to ...
No read or write protection bits seem to be set, so, back to ...
- Wed May 06, 2020 4:10 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: STM32L07 Simple EEPROM read and write without the example code.
- Replies: 3
- Views: 15143
STM32L07 Simple EEPROM read and write without the example code.
Hi Folks,
Following on from the bug bug detailed here (https://github.com/stm32duino/Arduino_Core_STM32/issues/1016) , the example code for EEPROM read and write wont operate on the internal EEPROM, but instead on an emulated EEPROM.
The advice on the bug note says that the HAL API can be used ...
Following on from the bug bug detailed here (https://github.com/stm32duino/Arduino_Core_STM32/issues/1016) , the example code for EEPROM read and write wont operate on the internal EEPROM, but instead on an emulated EEPROM.
The advice on the bug note says that the HAL API can be used ...
- Tue May 05, 2020 10:17 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: STM32L072CZ misreporting EEPROM size?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6100
Re: STM32L072CZ misreporting EEPROM size?
Ah, many thanks.
Apologies for the duplicate.
Apologies for the duplicate.
- Tue May 05, 2020 9:28 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: STM32L072CZ misreporting EEPROM size?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6100
Re: STM32L072CZ misreporting EEPROM size?
Is the EEPROM size something I have to set in CubeMX maybe? I can't find any reference to it, so I'm thinking that's not it.
- Tue May 05, 2020 9:27 am
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: STM32L072CZ misreporting EEPROM size?
- Replies: 4
- Views: 6100
STM32L072CZ misreporting EEPROM size?
Hi Guys,
L072CZ contains 6KB onboard EEPROM. Loving all that this chip has to offer.
https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/products/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32-32-bit-arm-cortex-mcus/stm32-ultra-low-power-mcus/stm32l0-series/stm32l0x2/stm32l072cz.html#
EEPROM.Length(); is throwing out 128 ...
L072CZ contains 6KB onboard EEPROM. Loving all that this chip has to offer.
https://www.st.com/content/st_com/en/products/microcontrollers-microprocessors/stm32-32-bit-arm-cortex-mcus/stm32-ultra-low-power-mcus/stm32l0-series/stm32l0x2/stm32l072cz.html#
EEPROM.Length(); is throwing out 128 ...
- Sat May 02, 2020 3:04 pm
- Forum: General discussion
- Topic: Some confusion around the ordering/mapping of the pins in the variant.cpp PinName array
- Replies: 11
- Views: 14241
Re: Some confusion around the ordering/mapping of the pins in the variant.cpp PinName array
Ah Amazing.
Thank you both for sharing your experience.
Thank you both for sharing your experience.