Arduino for STM32

konczakp wrote: ↑Wed Oct 19, 2022 8:40 pm @fpiSTM Okey, I've made changes locally to my Arduino IDE and it is working fine so made same changes on github with a pull request. I hope I did everything okey on github as I never used it in this way Please check

Thanks @konczakp , PR is well formed
Anyway as stated in the PR, as it is a generic clock it should use internal clock source.

@fpiSTM It is also possible to use :

RCC_OscInitStruct.HSEState = RCC_HSE_BYPASS;

But with other changes that I've made. It seams that mainly PLLM, PLLN, PLLP, PLLQ, PLLR were wrong

As mentioned here: https://community.st.com/s/question/0D5 ... hsi-or-hse and here https://community.st.com/s/question/0D5 ... leo-boards It is better to use HSE which is more accurate for high speed transmissions and despite of temperature. This is why I choose HSE instead HSI

Best way to get this solved would be creating new Variant for Nucleo-STM32F413ZH (copy paste from generic) and set HSE as default and for the generic STM32 set BYPASS. What do You think?

konczakp wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:43 am @fpiSTM It is also possible to use :

RCC_OscInitStruct.HSEState = RCC_HSE_BYPASS;

Yes but as said as it is the generic clock it have to use HSI. Not all boards have an HSE. This is the goal of the generic.

konczakp wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:43 am But with other changes that I've made. It seams that mainly PLLM, PLLN, PLLP, PLLQ, PLLR were wrong

Yes, all clock config need to be reviewed.

konczakp wrote: ↑Thu Oct 20, 2022 8:43 am As mentioned here: https://community.st.com/s/question/0D5 ... hsi-or-hse and here https://community.st.com/s/question/0D5 ... leo-boards It is better to use HSE which is more accurate for high speed transmissions and despite of temperature. This is why I choose HSE instead HSI

Best way to get this solved would be creating new Variant for Nucleo-STM32F413ZH (copy paste from generic) and set HSE as default and for the generic STM32 set BYPASS. What do You think?

Exactly, creating a dedicated variant for a board is always the best solution to optimize it. That's why I suggest in the issue I've opened to add it.