Welcome back stm32duino.com
-
- Posts: 633
- Joined: Thu Dec 19, 2019 1:23 am
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
WiKi access
This part of Roger's WiKi seems to resolve:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316163 ... STM32/wiki
As well as:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316155 ... =Main_Page
Thus, the Blue-Pill layout is found here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316163 ... =Blue_Pill
Red-Pill:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316171 ... e=Red_Pill
Maple-Mini clone:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316204 ... Maple_Mini
Black-Pill:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316155 ... Black_Pill
RoboDyn (black):
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316160 ... Black_Pill
On a personal note: Please consider a donation to Internet-achieve:
https://web.archive.org
Opinion
While the LeafLabs' Maple was a fantastic development when released, the dedicated, hacked, pre-ArduinoIDE version 1.0 software was a hack. Moving beyond this constraint and making the core 1.5x ArduinoIDE compatible was the work of many people, but Roger (IMO) deserves to be first in that list because he put his time and money into hosting and evolving the original STM32duino forum. Most of that info through 1Q2019 is available in the above links I provided.
But, for a couple of years, I have been vocal about all (mostly all) Roger's core users migrating to the STM Official core.
Please consider migrating, you will be well served by dropping the monolithic and aging Roger's core if you are doing anything serious with your STM32 uC.
Ray
This part of Roger's WiKi seems to resolve:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316163 ... STM32/wiki
As well as:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316155 ... =Main_Page
Thus, the Blue-Pill layout is found here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316163 ... =Blue_Pill
Red-Pill:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316171 ... e=Red_Pill
Maple-Mini clone:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316204 ... Maple_Mini
Black-Pill:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316155 ... Black_Pill
RoboDyn (black):
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316160 ... Black_Pill
On a personal note: Please consider a donation to Internet-achieve:
https://web.archive.org
Opinion
While the LeafLabs' Maple was a fantastic development when released, the dedicated, hacked, pre-ArduinoIDE version 1.0 software was a hack. Moving beyond this constraint and making the core 1.5x ArduinoIDE compatible was the work of many people, but Roger (IMO) deserves to be first in that list because he put his time and money into hosting and evolving the original STM32duino forum. Most of that info through 1Q2019 is available in the above links I provided.
But, for a couple of years, I have been vocal about all (mostly all) Roger's core users migrating to the STM Official core.
Please consider migrating, you will be well served by dropping the monolithic and aging Roger's core if you are doing anything serious with your STM32 uC.
Ray
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
+1 thanks ![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
i think both the 'old' libmaple core and the official core can co-exist. they have different 'features' literally. as the design objectives has evolved to be different e.g. libmaple is going more towards 'fit' to a particular mcu - hence it is 'thinner and lighter' and sacrificing portability while the official core is tailored more towards supporting the stm32 family of mcus, so the official core has much broader use
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
i think both the 'old' libmaple core and the official core can co-exist. they have different 'features' literally. as the design objectives has evolved to be different e.g. libmaple is going more towards 'fit' to a particular mcu - hence it is 'thinner and lighter' and sacrificing portability while the official core is tailored more towards supporting the stm32 family of mcus, so the official core has much broader use
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
another thing i liked about stm32 family of mcus at least from m3 up is they are native generic usb devices
though other mcu families e.g. nxp, freescale, ti etc have pretty much the same things
the other thing is the well written verbose reference manuals.
there are a lot of arm derivatives not from the big names the likes of ti, st, nxp et.al that hardly even release their reference manuals in public. some my guess may even requires nda just to get the reference manuals if they are even available at all.
though other mcu families e.g. nxp, freescale, ti etc have pretty much the same things
the other thing is the well written verbose reference manuals.
there are a lot of arm derivatives not from the big names the likes of ti, st, nxp et.al that hardly even release their reference manuals in public. some my guess may even requires nda just to get the reference manuals if they are even available at all.
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
Thanks Fedreric for all your effort in this forum and arduino stm32 core. Thanks Roger Clark, ST and all community. Glad to see this forum online again !
Thankyou very much !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Thankyou very much !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
![Smile :)](./images/smilies/icon_e_smile.gif)
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
Great news
Thanx to all that helps keep this forum up & running
/Bingo
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
Thanx to all that helps keep this forum up & running
/Bingo
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
Looks good! Today I was surprised to see that the forums are back.
This stuff is all hosted on Github pages. Feel free to make pull requests for missing/incorrect information.
FYI: I covered some of these boards on STM32-base too:mrburnette wrote: ↑Thu Dec 19, 2019 3:03 pm Thus, the Blue-Pill layout is found here:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316163 ... =Blue_Pill
Red-Pill:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316171 ... e=Red_Pill
Maple-Mini clone:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316204 ... Maple_Mini
Black-Pill:
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316155 ... Black_Pill
RoboDyn (black):
https://web.archive.org/web/20190316160 ... Black_Pill
This stuff is all hosted on Github pages. Feel free to make pull requests for missing/incorrect information.
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
Glad to see the forum back online. ![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
![Very Happy :D](./images/smilies/icon_e_biggrin.gif)
-
- Posts: 502
- Joined: Fri Dec 27, 2019 4:53 pm
- Location: Munich, Germany
- Contact:
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
A big thanks to Frederik from my side, too.
And hello to everybody, good to have our "daily meeting place" back again.![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
And hello to everybody, good to have our "daily meeting place" back again.
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
Nice to see you all again and welcome
sorry again for this long wait![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
![Wink ;)](./images/smilies/icon_e_wink.gif)
sorry again for this long wait
![Confused :?](./images/smilies/icon_e_confused.gif)
Re: Welcome back stm32duino.com
Thanks for bringing back a forum, on this url, and officially recognised by ST.
I'd sort of guessed but wasn't sure - it was necessary to register again. I used the same username as last time, which didn't cause a problem because the forum didn't have any memory of me....
It might be worth mentioning this need to register again, in the first post, to reduce the confusion a little.
I'd sort of guessed but wasn't sure - it was necessary to register again. I used the same username as last time, which didn't cause a problem because the forum didn't have any memory of me....
It might be worth mentioning this need to register again, in the first post, to reduce the confusion a little.